Wolf Bird wrote: I'm not so sure about why military troops...seems more health people would be better, but whatever.
Zio_Falz wrote:Wolf Bird wrote: I'm not so sure about why military troops...seems more health people would be better, but whatever.
The US military is first hand when it comes to medicine, by numbers of medically trained personnel and publications of research. Every branch, (which doesnt count marines or coast guard as a branch in themselves,) and also including the little spoke of branch of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, has huge contributions by medical personnel, civilian, enlisted, and officer, to the field of medicine. Not to mention the unpublished, which cant be discussed (usually to their own people)
WHO does a lot and by no means am I understating their efforts. But the US military has a highly skilled and trained medical force. An upwards number of over 1 million medical personnel.
sounds like a recruitment ad, but seriously, all data.
http://www.usuhs.mil ---the main research and training grounds, but not exclusively since the separate branches have different schools for different specialties.
http://www.usphs.gov --the pub health corps. public health is a form of defense after all. these guys are the ones who will cure the black plague.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed --international journal source. if you want to count the number of research articles registered by usuhs versus other agencies.
and yes, upwards to and exceeding 1 million medical technicians, scientists, nurse, PhD, and physicians trained and qualified.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests