Supreme Court votes on Video Game Law

Discussion of news stories dealing with gaming.

Supreme Court votes on Video Game Law

Postby Silver_Surfer1 » Tue Jun 28, '11, 5:50 am

The Supreme Court has spoken out in regards to the law in California that would have made it illegal to sell violent video games to minors, etc.:

http://ingame.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/ ... ame-battle

Very interesting to see and read the thoughts of the Supreme Court members in regards to video games, etc. :yes:

Do you agree with their decision, or not?

Comments or Opinions?
Last edited by Silver_Surfer1 on Tue Jun 28, '11, 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

:rose: Happy 27th Anniversary Fringes Of Algo :rose:
~ Founded April 01, 1997 ~

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Silver_Surfer1
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 29024
Joined: March 2007
Location: USA
Achievements: 499
Gender: Female

Re: Supreme Court votes on Video Game Law

Postby Rudo » Tue Jun 28, '11, 11:05 pm

One time I agree with their decision. Games should not be banned.
User avatar
Rudo
Esper Apprentice
Esper Apprentice
 
Posts: 776
Joined: September 2007
Location: Wherever I happen to be at the moment
Achievements: 192

Re: Supreme Court votes on Video Game Law

Postby Thoul » Wed Jun 29, '11, 3:48 am

I'm glad the court ruled that games are protected under the First Amendment. While I understand and respect the desire to protect children from games intended for a more mature audience than can handle that content appropriately, it is not the government's place to do that. That responsibility should fall on the legal guardian of a child. I can only hope that this ruling will reinforce that concept to opponents of the gaming medium and spur them to work with the industry and gamers, rather than against us.
User avatar
Thoul
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 12923
Joined: March 2007
Location: USA
Achievements: 123
Gender: Male

Re: Supreme Court votes on Video Game Law

Postby Thoul » Tue Jul 26, '11, 10:06 pm

The Entertainment Software Association is now seeking reimbursement for the legal fees they incurred while fighting this law. They filed a motion with the Supreme Court looking for $1.1 million to be paid by California. I bet the tax payers in that state aren't going to be happy about that!
User avatar
Thoul
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 12923
Joined: March 2007
Location: USA
Achievements: 123
Gender: Male


Return to In the News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests