Rick wrote: I'm an author to and of what I won't brag. There is no point. It's none of anyone's business. I don't think the fellow member would like you bragging about him as well.
Mind how personal you make this. Anything interpreted as direct hostility is against the site's rules.
That said, Srijita is one of my best friends and has openly shared that
she is an author. I am merely stating facts when I say that as a librarian I can pull her journals off a database and/or periodical shelf, which I
have, and
read them to boot. Now, kindly tell me how is that a boast?
Rick wrote:I'll show you a dozen books or even a dozen shows using the same ideas and plot schemes. Even a dozen tokatsu shows and such..
Sure. But I'll also show you that
bibliographies are part of books, as well. Anything that is
directly taken from another author is plagiarism. That is a fact. Authors who know what they're doing give credit. How is that difficult to understand?
Rick wrote:Tanith has read one of my stories and anyone on this board would read it and probably accuse me of stealing some idea from somewhere even though I haven't. That is the damn problem.
Unless you can provide evidence to said statement, then you can say anything of the sort. The issue is whether your accusation has merit. I, as well as two other members on this site, can give direct evidence as to how my own fanfiction has been plagiarized from someone who has been known to plagiarize, anyhow. And I will agree that it is a problem.
Rick wrote:Medical journals and literature are not the same as fantasy/scifi/unreal things.
Where did I say they were the same thing? I didn't.
Rick wrote:In fact, the only originality really lies in Medical journals/research/experiments. I'll give you that.
I disagree. Medical doctors and professionals attend seminars and, considering their profession and expertise, are aware of new research and discoveries. Generally, they write their journals and books based upon research that is known within the field. You can't box certain subjects and say, "Well, this is a medical terminology book, so this has more originality than any other book in any other field." Show me evidence (statistical) that supports your claim. Until then, it's unsupported and unreasonable.
Rick wrote:As for the fantasy/scifi/imaginary medium? Very few original ideas exist.
Says who? You are giving human creativity and intellectuality too little credit.